Previously I have written about the dismal performance of our free and independent press in performing their duties as the watchdog for our republic. I have bitterly complained that the liberal bias shown by the mainstream media gave us a socialist president with their blind dogmatic regurgitation of the leftist talking points. Now the hand that fed them, slaps them on the nose while yelling “bad dog.”
The newest extremist put forward by the socialist administration is Elena Kagan, Supreme Court nominee. I have several problems with Ms. Kagan, and it seems members of the media do also. The first interview was done with a Whitehouse staffer asking the questions! I feel pretty confident that most media outlets would not ask difficult questions of the nominee, but having your own staff play the part of reporter is outrageous.
The video has been edited and cut together. It is easy to see that the administration is only showing us what they want us to see. I, being the helpful guy I am, decided I would try to recreate the parts of the “interview” that were deleted. Here, to the best of my knowledge, are the parts of the “interview” that are on the cutting room floor:
Administration Junior Staffer Lackey Interviewer: What is your opinion of military service and the role of the military?
Radical Supreme Court Nominee: As my good friend Senator John Kerry pointed out, we all know military personnel are baby killers and do nothing but help to oppress people throughout the world. That is why I banned them from recruiting on the campus of Harvard when I was the Dean.
Whitehouse Little More Senior Editor: That is a great point Ms. Kagan, but unfortunately that warmonger Bush got us involved in an illegal war that we are stuck in. We have to try to convince people we like the military or they won’t feel safe. We will have to skip this answer.
Administration Junior Staffer Lackey Interviewer: Ms. Kagan, what aspects of the First Amendment do you think we should repeal first?
Radical Supreme Court Nominee: As I have argued before, the motive of the government is the most important factor when restricting free speech. Government can restrict speech if the speech may cause harm. Harm is defined as incitement to violence, hate-speech, threatening or “fighting” words.
Whitehouse Little More Senior Editor: When you’re right, you’re right. We have to stop people from saying naughty things, especially if they are talking about us. Let’s do this, we will cut this answer out and after you are confirmed, you can side with the savior’s new leftist solicitor general in getting rid of this silly amendment.
I’m sure there was more, but you get the idea. We are getting another radical that no one knows anything about and the media will give a pass to because they are not doing their jobs. We need a free and independent press to protect our freedoms. We are not getting that. I would ask each of you to pray for the health of Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy. If we lose one of them, we are in big trouble.
Posted by scr2695 
